BF aimbot video

Started by lexx · 14 posts · 1,690 views

  2. #2
    Nothing Angers me more than a piece of **it hacker...may they all rot in hell!
  3. #3
    The resolution is poor, I'd like to see more detail. . .but from the reactions/actions of the pictured enemy, this looks real.

    I've seen other hacks where ppl were playing single player, but this didn't look like that to me. I saw revives, I saw prones at the flag. . .

    Explains a bit now doesn't it?

    Anyone else have an opinion on what they saw in the video?
  4. #4
    DocJon wrote:
    The resolution is poor, I'd like to see more detail. . .but from the reactions/actions of the pictured enemy, this looks real.

    I've seen other hacks where ppl were playing single player, but this didn't look like that to me. I saw revives, I saw prones at the flag. . .

    Explains a bit now doesn't it?

    Anyone else have an opinion on what they saw in the video?



    Well, let me get this out of the way first... The music in both vids was great!! good choices... 😄

    But, they looked real enough to me. There is not a game or software out there that someone won't find a way to manipulate, just give it time.
  5. #5
    I guess maybe I am old or something, but really who cares. why would you bother. what fun is it to kill everyone while cheating? isn't the fun in being able to beat your opponent? this is why the point system made BF worse... not that there weren't hacks previously, but at least then you werent accomplishing something by using them
  6. #6
    Bubbaspanky wrote:
    I guess maybe I am old or something, but really who cares. why would you bother. what fun is it to kill everyone while cheating? isn't the fun in being able to beat your opponent? this is why the point system made BF worse... not that there weren't hacks previously, but at least then you werent accomplishing something by using them



    You're right: You're old or something.
    Apparently, they like to ruin ppl's fun, go to clan servers and proceed to rack up 40-5 k-d ratios using sniper rifles at 10 meters.

    Ppl cause all sorts of trouble on the internet for little-to-no reason, why should this be any different?
  7. #7
    Why do some "people" want to kill us just because we have a different way of life? You are talking about people who do not think logically, whether it is a game or real life.

    Why do people write viruses?? I never understood the idea of writing software to purposefully f^%$ other peoples computers up. You won't even see your handy work.. This is why I basically hate people, they always take advantage of you if possible.

    I agree totally. Cheating is just lame and no fun at all.

    They actually use these video's to SELL this softwware!!

    I was trying to see if the hack also auto aimed on you. This did not look liked it helped in the aiming but made it so they always know EXACTLY where everyone is. Just as bad though. To be able to kill through through the sheet metal fence because they see you???

    This just sucks. PB needs to not only check the HD content but what is actually running in a users system's memory while gaming. That is the only way to catch this crap, if at all. PB should check all running processes and the memory itself for this code.
  8. #8
    Paladin wrote:
    I was trying to see if the hack also auto aimed on you. This did not look liked it helped in the aiming but made it so they always know EXACTLY where everyone is. Just as bad though. To be able to kill through through the sheet metal fence because they see you???

    i think otherwise. it looked exactly like a cs hack. it shows everybody through walls and such.... then aims on the nearest target as soon as he fires the weapon. so when hes firing its constantly sticking to the enemy. when not firing it didnt move hes crosshairs for him. the inaccurate fashion is simply due to the nature of the bf2 engine. in any case... i feel i have just wasted 2 minutes of my time talking about it. these people seem like 6 year old children that knock their little sisters ice cream cone to the floor just to get attention. just another reminder of the foul nature of a great population of scum that walk among us.
  9. #9
    Paladin wrote:
    This just sucks. PB needs to not only check the HD content but what is actually running in a users system's memory while gaming. That is the only way to catch this crap, if at all. PB should check all running processes and the memory itself for this code.


    No thanx! Thats kinda how SafeGame works used for TWL matches in UT. Absolutely sucks. Takes more than 5 minutes at the beginning of a round to do its check. Already, the hacks are then just loaded after SG, used to cheat, and turned on/off. This is the main reason I dumped all custom skins, weaps, and most mods, to shorten extended scanning from Safegame.

    The only way to catch cheaters effectively is to allow spectating a user with demo recording running. This gives concrete evidence of cheating and allows the GUID to be placed on a UTAN overall banlist. Since BF2 doesn't allow spec'ing, that puts the best option outta reach.

    btw, look at the video again. It DOES autoaim. The pointer clearly jumps to a target in a couple places.
  10. #10
    hacks make baby jesus cry 🙁
  11. #11
    lexx wrote:
    No thanx! Thats kinda how SafeGame works used for TWL matches in UT. Absolutely sucks. Takes more than 5 minutes at the beginning of a round to do its check. Already, the hacks are then just loaded after SG, used to cheat, and turned on/off. This is the main reason I dumped all custom skins, weaps, and most mods, to shorten extended scanning from Safegame.

    The only way to catch cheaters effectively is to allow spectating a user with demo recording running. This gives concrete evidence of cheating and allows the GUID to be placed on a UTAN overall banlist. Since BF2 doesn't allow spec'ing, that puts the best option outta reach.

    btw, look at the video again. It DOES autoaim. The pointer clearly jumps to a target in a couple places.



    Believe me I was not arguing about it. You are Pauwder may be right as far as the auto aiming. I cannot tell for sure due to the video quality. Just looked like "it" did seem to have to aim a bit for some of those head shots. Otherwise "it" could have just got near them and it would have still worked. Maybe it was just out o habit.

    Either way "it" is a F&^% head 😉

    I also agree with your points about the checks. They will still find a way around it, why bother. Just frustrates me to no end.
  12. #12
    A different one, good quality, nicely done analysis.

    About 40 meg. . .

    http://www.core-gaming.co.uk/public/lootcheater.avi

    We've had at least ONE on our server. Perhaps two that I can think of, but definately one. No way does that dude zero in on me at 100+ yds while I'm under cover except for my head, while he's running at right angles to me, under fire from a few ppl, and presented with many other overt, active, noisy targets.

    I wonder if the aimbot is a definate hit everytime, or is it subject to the same cone-of-fire that we are. I think it's the latter, it just puts the gun in a position to hit, and the cone-of-fire that is built-in to the game means they don't hit every shot. . .but they've got an instant bead on you, and it gives them the best chance possible of hitting you. If you crouch or prone, zoom in, shoot short bursts, etc (normal cone-of-fire reduction techniques), it would probably help the aimbot work.
  13. #13
    Actually, this has been discussed to death in other game forums. One problem stems from the autoaim built into many FPS'ers. Load up say HalfLife, Fear, UT, etc, and set autoaim on, and start a game. The sight will pull right onto a target within a certain radius of center.

    All these f@#$'s need to do is hack the code to tap into that resource. Thier main problem is detection. As said before, if EA would have allowed spectators, autoaim cheaters would be easier to catch.

    If anti cheat measures, and forget that bullshit punkbuster, can't be added, its going to cripple BF2. The more cheaters win and YOU know it, the less your going to play the game. Why waste your time coming in last??

    Beta testing 2142, I looked at the leaderboard. There was one player with a variation of his handle +01,02,03, etc , up to like 13 or 15. All top 15 spots he held the lead with 250k points. 2142 is going to be rushed out, and its clear its full of holes.

    I suspect this is the reason UT07 is being delayed so late. The engine and maps have been done for a year or more, but the cheating in 04' was nuts. UTComp, and one I worked on.. F2K4 (for instagib) not only added BRIGHTskins like you see in the BF2 video, but you can change all enemies to yellow and have hitsounds.

    For a battlefield simulator like BF2, this was appalling.
  14. #14
    lexx wrote:
    Actually, this has been discussed to death in other game forums. One problem stems from the autoaim built into many FPS'ers. Load up say HalfLife, Fear, UT, etc, and set autoaim on, and start a game. The sight will pull right onto a target within a certain radius of center.

    All these f@#$'s need to do is hack the code to tap into that resource. Thier main problem is detection. As said before, if EA would have allowed spectators, autoaim cheaters would be easier to catch.

    If anti cheat measures, and forget that bullshit punkbuster, can't be added, its going to cripple BF2. The more cheaters win and YOU know it, the less your going to play the game. Why waste your time coming in last??

    Beta testing 2142, I looked at the leaderboard. There was one player with a variation of his handle +01,02,03, etc , up to like 13 or 15. All top 15 spots he held the lead with 250k points. 2142 is going to be rushed out, and its clear its full of holes.

    I suspect this is the reason UT07 is being delayed so late. The engine and maps have been done for a year or more, but the cheating in 04' was nuts. UTComp, and one I worked on.. F2K4 (for instagib) not only added BRIGHTskins like you see in the BF2 video, but you can change all enemies to yellow and have hitsounds.


    250,000 points, and the game isn't even out of BETA!?!?!??!/11
    Incredible.

    I take it the mods you are talking of are designed to be anti-cheat, preventing aimbots, invisible skins, etc. It's cool to have those as an option, since it didn't come with the game 🙁


    I have never got the BF2 battle recorder to work when I've tried it in the past. Does our server have this option, and does it WORK?

    lexx wrote:
    The more cheaters win and YOU know it, the less your going to play the game. Why waste your time coming in last??

    Exactly.