Get your votes in on the flavor of the week 🙂
Friday Night Fights for 2/24/06
-
#1 -
#2 sorry, i'll play whatever just give me a little download lead time. I since I was lazy didn't get the last one downloaded until I got on and wasted and hour of playtime downloading. -
#3 I voted for Vanilla, but would gladly play CTF. BFPro does nothing for me, and I didn't have much fun playing Nations at War (I don't like 64 player maps). -
#4 I voted for SF. I was thinking we could hook up with the Shh=00=ters guys again on their ranked server.
However, I would be up for some Vanilla. I'm digging the new patch. I even play better. :-) -
#5 Does everyone have SF?
Anyone who wants to play Friday let us know now if you don't have SF!!! -
#6 I thought SF has a crashbug with 1.2 Did 1.2.1 come out? -
#7 Certain maps are to be left out of rotation. I believe it is the night maps. I'm sure they have taken care of it. -
#8 So we doing Vanilla or trying to connect with the Sh=00=ters guys again?
I am up for either and should be online around 9:00 EST - earlier if I can get away with it. -
#9 Sorry guys, I will be AWOL tonight, may be in late. Turns out McAffee did more of a toll on my machine than I thought. I am going to reload this evening after work.
hmm -
#10 ACK!
Reload your software in this order.
TeamSpeak - Connect To GRB Server
BF2
BF2:SF (corrected)
Patches
Join Server......
K? Good! -
#11 Insert SF between BF2 and Patches just in case 🙂 -
#12 Bubbaspanky wrote:Does everyone have SF?
Anyone who wants to play Friday let us know now if you don't have SF!!!
I was planning on playing tonite, but do not have SF.... -
#13 that means we play Vanilla then or maybe a mod if we get bored 🙂 -
#14 Vanilla, and Raze you don't get the choice to skip out. I haven't been able to play FNF in 2 weeks, so everyone will show up. -
#15 Vanilla it be! -
#16 FWIW we could still do BF2 CM or DC CTF! Just FYI.
OVER! 😉 -
#17 Custom Maps -
#18 ahhh ahhaha sorry for my slowness ;-) -
#19 Tonight was one of the funnest nights on BF2 I've had. I didn't particularly do well but it was really fun. I haven't seen 8 grb's on the same team since BFV or was it BF42? Really cool. :armed: -
#20 Indeed was a very fun evening. -
#21 very much fun. I don't really care for such large teams, but it was definitely fun to have a couple of GRB squads running around. Few more people and we would have had 2 full squads - I think that would be a first for BF2 anyhow. 🙂 -
#22 Sarge wrote:very much fun. I don't really care for such large teams, but it was definitely fun to have a couple of GRB squads running around. Few more people and we would have had 2 full squads - I think that would be a first for BF2 anyhow. :)
So you do not like larger teams? Ohhhh noooo...
Did you mean the 64 player server or large teams as in in the clan?
I had a lot of fun. You guys are cool and seem to play as a team so that is a plus. -
#23 I didn't care for the 64 player server myself. It was just too chaotic.
Personally, I prefer the 32 player maps with 40 players. 20 per team seems to be a nice number.
With that said, I had a blast playing with you guys. Looking forward to the next FNF. -
#24 I am 100% with Atomm. I had a blast I hope we can keep those numbers up on fridays! -
#25 i have to disagree myself. I really don't like the smaller maps with more people than specified. That is when I see my most lag. Also with so many people in a smaller area always seems chaotic to me. I was able to run away to get health many times and stay in the battle. I never lagged once lastnight. -
#26 Atomm wrote:I didn't care for the 64 player server myself. It was just too chaotic.
Personally, I prefer the 32 player maps with 40 players. 20 per team seems to be a nice number.
With that said, I had a blast playing with you guys. Looking forward to the next FNF.
Hey I had a good time last nite, once I finally got through that damn account server login :evil:
Spot on Atom, I prefer 32/32 maps/players. Got spawn killed too many times last nite with 64, and forget about getting equipment. Kinda pathetic seeing a dozen or more waiting for a blackhawk on the carrier..
Seeya next Friday nite, at least until 11pm or so. -
#27 I am of two mind sets. Sometimes 32 seems more manageable. 16 each side seems enough and Is not bad.
Other times though I LOVE having a nice 64 player server with 32 players on each side. It really makes the game stand out from others with so much going on making it feel more like a war!
You have enough players to use various squads doing different things. With 32 players you have enough to guard each flag, have Spec ops to go kill their stuff and have many attack forces to get new flags and have plenty of air support. If the lag is not bad and it is a good server it is REALLY fun!
I am actually looking forward to future days where we may actually have 128 or even 256 player games. Man that would be cool with HUGE maps!! -
#28 Paladin wrote:So you do not like larger teams? Ohhhh noooo...
Did you mean the 64 player server or large teams as in in the clan?
I meant the servers not the clan 🙂 I want more people here, but can't handle 64 player games.
The 64 player servers are fun until they get about 50 players on them and then they just get too chaotic for me and it becomes a spawn-die--spawn--die kind of thing with frickin' snipers everywhere. That and my pc starts to have issues keeping up. :?
I prefer the 32 player map sizes for the most part and servers that have say 30-40 people. That seems manageable to both my brain and my PC without working either too hard. Also gives you a better shot at getting a vehicle if you want one, and less plane/helo whoring on most maps. -
#29 :goodpost: -
#30 :wstupid: -
#31 :lies: