David Lee Roth touring with Van Halen this summer

Started by Paladin · 19 posts · 2,715 views

  1. #1
    Finally after 20 years David Lee Roth will be touring with Van Halen this summer for about 40 shows.

    I am VERY curious what the hell Eddie looks like now!!! PLEASE do NOT post that picture again. I cannot take it!!! 😉
  2. #2
    I give em 5 shows, then they cancel......

  3. #3
    Atomm wrote:
    I give em 5 shows, then they cancel......



    I don't know man, there is a LOT of money to be made here. They had Dave and Sammy touring together and they do not like each other. They will just keep Eddie and dave apart until show time.

    But again if it did get canceled so soon, it would not surprise me 😉

    Van Halen is one of those rare bands that has been around forever yet is clueless to what the hell they are really doing. Have a good singer, have some good CD's then kick him out of the band. Get another good singer, have some good CD's then kick him out of the band.

    Why can't we all just get along? 😉
  4. #4
    Because Eddie is a control freak.....

  5. #5
    Atomm wrote:
    Because Eddie is a control freak.....



    I think they all are and that is the problem. His brother Alex is as well and David is well...just David 😉
  6. #6
    Atomm wrote:
    Because Eddie is a control freak.....


    It's starting to look that way, isn't it? If you have a problem with one guy, maybe it's him. If you have a problem with his replacement, it's still possible it's not you, but it starting to look bad. . .It's easy to believe Roth is an ass, I dunno about Sammy tho.

    You think they can make it past rehearsals? Maybe with Eddie's decline in health, the $$$ will help him shut his mouth and keep his eyes on the prize.
  7. #7
    This will be intresting. Never thought they would ever do anything with David again. Press will have a great time with this.
  8. #8
    Varg wrote:
    This will be intresting. Never thought they would ever do anything with David again. Press will have a great time with this.


    I hope they keep it together long enough for another CD. It would probably suck, but when you have a band that's produced as much great music as they have, you gotta take the chance. Besides, what else is out there for us Classic Rock lovers. The Stones? Please! Not that I haven't loved a lot of older Stones material, but would it KILL the industry not to bury every new Classic-Rock-style band since the early 90's?

    A Rolling Stone Magazine article about Classic Rock(it's a year-old article, tho): 😛 😛 😛 😛
    http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/925...ve_classic_rock

    I don't always agree with Rolling Stone, but this looks like an interesting article. Given that in at least ONE market I know of (Pittsburgh), Classic Rock stations still do very well (#1 in Pgh), I think there's still a strong market for it, and I believe the record companies are not recording new Classic-Rock-style bands ever since Grunge hit. . .they're looking for that BIG new thing, the band that will go multi-platinum, like Nirvana and Pearl Jam, and the old safe choices, like Tom Petty & The Stones.

    Cite for market status:
    http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07017/754250-80.stm

    (WDVE is Classic Rock)

    I'm totally wild-ass-guessing that the record industry is burying new Classic Rock bands. I have no cite for that. For all I know, groups just gave up the genre in the early 90's. . .but the industry is notorious for only putting out what THEY think will sell, disregarding that which does not fit their ideas.

    Heh, "Gimme Shelter" by the Stones just came up on WinAmp. I just recently found out that I was laboring under a 25-year-long misconception that Tina Turner sang on that track. Turns out the backing vocals were sang by Merry Clayton, who was only 20 at the time of the recording. I had to find multiple sources to verify this, so strong was my misconception.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimme_Shelter
  9. #9
    I don't believe they are completely burying classic rock. I mean, John Foggerty won a Grammy for Album of the Year a few years back.

    I think the problem is most classic rock stations won't take a chance on newer music with a classic sound because it's a safe Genre. Heck, in another 10 years, Grunge will be considered classic rock....


  10. #10
    Atomm wrote:
    I don't believe they are completely burying classic rock. I mean, John Foggerty won a Grammy for Album of the Year a few years back.

    I think the problem is most classic rock stations won't take a chance on newer music with a classic sound because it's a safe Genre. Heck, in another 10 years, Grunge will be considered classic rock....


    You really think the recording studios are recording & releasing it, but the station's aren't playing it? If you hear of something like that, please let me know, as I'll go look for it.

    "Classic Rock" used to be just "Rock", and they used to play new music all the the time. I never thought that a radio station would consciously decide to stop playing the next "Black Crowes" and stagnate. Doesn't make sense to me. For awhile, I figured that bands had moved on and there was no new classic rock bands to record. I'm not sure I believe that now. . . or if it IS true, it wasn't true 10 years ago.

    Fogerty's been around since the 60's. When some NEW act comes along that plays in the 'classic rock' style, gets solid backing and advertising from their record company, gets airplay. . . that will impress me. They don't even need to win awards. It just seems odd that there's still a lot of interest in that music, but no one MAKING it that hasn't already been making it for 30 years. There's probably a big opportunity for some small company to make a splash, like Alligator Records did in the Blues/Houserocking music in the 90's, only in a genre that is much more popular.

    Nah, 10 years, Grunge will still be Grunge. . .you have to differentiate somehow.
  11. #11
    The thing with Classic Rock is it's moving through music that has already established itself. For instance, I use to Listen to the Classic Rock station in Oklahoma City. The played stuff from the 60's and 70's. But as the audience got older, they needed to tap into a slightly younger generation because that is what the advertisers want. So, they stopped playing a lot of stuff from the 60's and started focusing more on the 70's and early 80's. Styx, Boston, Asia, Bad Company, etc....

    I was really bummed because I loved hearing The Beatles, Jefferson Airplane, The Doors, etc.....

    http://classicrock.about.com/

    Looks like the Eagles and America are releasing some new stuff.

    http://www.johnfogerty.com/albums.html

    From wikipedia: Blue Moon Swamp, which won the Grammy for Best Rock album in 1997.

    I heard some of it and I really liked it, but I've always liked CCR and besides, Put me in coach, I'm ready to play still rings in my ears..... :-)

  12. #12
    Eddies on the cover of one of the guitar magazines this month. I can see signs of the scary dude we posted previously, but I swear they put his head on a body shot from 20 years ago.

  13. #13
    Atomm wrote:
    The thing with Classic Rock is it's moving through music that has already established itself. For instance, I use to Listen to the Classic Rock station in Oklahoma City. The played stuff from the 60's and 70's. But as the audience got older, they needed to tap into a slightly younger generation because that is what the advertisers want. So, they stopped playing a lot of stuff from the 60's and started focusing more on the 70's and early 80's. Styx, Boston, Asia, Bad Company, etc....



    We're not on the same page here. I'm not debating why 'classic rock' changes, or has to change. Instead, I am bemoaning the fact that what I once called 'Rock" BECAME "Classic Rock".

    I know you're younger than me, but cast your mind back: Imagine a time when you'd turn on the radio, and hearing what we NOW call "classic rock". Only as you listen, you notice they're not calling it that. . .they're calling it "Rock". As you continue to listen, you realize that it's 1991.

    Now, imagine you're in a some sort of time warp (just a jump to the left). You continue listening, the pages on the desk calander before you fly off into the distance at an ever increasing rate. . .the years go by, but something odd happens. . .the music never changes! Whereas previously, the station had been advertising and playing new bands & new tunes, now they are not.

    What happened here? I would imagine, in 1991, the Program Director did NOT say, "That's enough. We don't ever need to buy any more CD's. We're gonna take the music that had been changing and vital, and freeze it in time. Let's call it 'Classic Rock'."

    I figure they stayed with the type of music that was putting them at the top of the ratings regularly, but since Nirvana and Pearl Jam had such a great reception, the record companies went looking for the NEXT Pearl Jam or Nirvana. . .and so, the next 'Black Crowes', the next 'Deep Purple', etc, either went unrecorded, or switched to Grunge at that time.

    Music changes by it's nature. Listening to Blues music did not spawn Robert Johnson, but Robert Plant. Led Zep in turn gave birth to Nirvana. It was going to change, and seems to change about every 10 years. I think we'll find it becomes cyclic, given enough time. Now that we have good quality recording tech, and lossless, long-term storage, we're always going to have the old stuff to go back to. Maybe one day we'll have virtually all classifications thriving at once, with enough of an audience to support them all. Right now, however, I regret the fairly sudden change that all but killed the kind of music I favored, and left me foundering, grabbing a stray piece of music here and there like so much driftwood, never again to see new favorite tunes popping up like saplings at a Christmas tree farm.

    On thinking about it, it was inevitable, at this point in time, that my favorite style of music would go the way of the Dodo. I still think the asshole record executives helped hasten it, however. . .

    Cool news about the Eagles. I celebrate their entire catalog (2 e-penis points for whoever identifies that quote), but curses them and hates them forever for what they did to concert ticket prices. I saw America at a concert once. Curiously, not at THEIR concert. I was taking in an Adrian Belew concert, and Adrian addressed them as they sat in the crowd.

    Bob Seger and Meat Loaf both had new CD's late last year. . .neither did anything for me . Tragic, as I was SO hungry for new tunes.
  14. #14
    http://www.cinemablend.com/music/Van-Halen...appen-2945.html
    (Safe for work, unsafe for your mood.)

    😆 Hahahahahahahahaheeheehee. . . . . .hahahahhahahahahahaha! Hahahahaahah. . . Heheh. . . 🙁 .aaahh, aaaaarrrggghhh! 🤦

    AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Oh well, they're so old and tore up, they probably would've looked like this on-stage anyway:


  15. #15
    Damn you! I insists you stop pointing me to that picture, it gives me the creeps. Your avatar does not help..

    I got chills now......

    STOP IT STOP IT!! or I shall taunt you for a second time!!!!

    As far as the topic, this really does not surprise me. I would have been more shocked if they did tour.

    Seriously that picture freaks me out man... Please stop.... please....

    seriously...

    stop

    please.
  16. #16
    Love the new icon Doc.... heh
  17. #17
    Atomm wrote:
    Love the new icon Doc.... heh



    Could you imagine life if you could see a photo of yourself in the future like that.
    --Things that make you go hmmmm
  18. #18
    Paladin wrote:
    Could you imagine life if you could see a photo of yourself in the future like that.
    --Things that make you go hmmmm



    If 20 years ago I saw a picture of how I look now. . . I would not have been at all surprised.

    Since Atomm likes the Avatar, I thought I'd post the original, courtesy of FARK.
    Look away, Paladin. . . (Somebody said, "Fair warning!")

    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
  19. #19
    FWIW:

    Billboard reported that this was not canceled, just postponed. They also "said" it has nothing to do with the members not getting along.

    Yea right. 😉